Asurvo
Fintech

Move fast, stay compliant, survive diligence.

From payment processors to neobanks, fintechs face overlapping compliance obligations. Asurvo unifies them into one program.

Frameworks we cover

Relevant to your industry.

SOC 2PCI DSSISO 27001GDPR

Highlights

What matters for your industry.

PCI DSS scoping and documentation
Vendor risk for banking partners
Audit-ready reporting

Fintech compliance

The fintech compliance stack, layer by layer

Fintech obligations arrive from three directions at once. Regulators impose rules that depend on your license and the products you offer. Card networks impose PCI DSS through your acquirer or processor. And the banks, enterprise customers, and investors you depend on impose their own diligence, which is often stricter than the law. A workable program treats these as overlapping demands on one set of controls rather than as separate projects run by separate people.

Regimes a fintech is likely to meet

Regime, Enforced or required by, Applies to, Core demand comparison
PCI DSS v4.0.1PCI Security Standards Council publishes it; card brands and acquirers require itAny entity that stores, processes, or transmits cardholder data, or can affect its securityTwelve requirement areas covering network security, data protection, vulnerability management, access, monitoring, and policy; validated by self-assessment or QSA
GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)Federal Trade CommissionNon-bank financial institutions under FTC jurisdiction, such as many lenders, brokers, and payment-adjacent firmsA written information security program with a qualified individual, risk assessment, specific safeguards, and FTC notification for qualifying security events
SOC 1AICPA standard (SSAE 18); performed by a CPA firmService organizations whose services affect customers' internal control over financial reportingTested controls over processes and systems relevant to customers' financial statements
SOC 2AICPA Trust Services Criteria; performed by a CPA firmService organizations handling customer dataSecurity controls, plus optional Availability, Confidentiality, Processing Integrity, and Privacy criteria
Sponsor bank due diligenceThe partner bank, under the 2023 interagency guidance on third-party relationships from the Federal Reserve, FDIC, and OCCFintechs offering products through a bank partnerOngoing oversight of your controls, compliance management, complaints, and financial condition
DORAEU financial supervisorsEU financial entities and, indirectly, the ICT providers serving them; applies from 17 January 2025ICT risk management, incident reporting, resilience testing, and contractual requirements for ICT third parties

Not every row applies to every fintech. A B2B payments API that touches card data needs PCI DSS and probably SOC 2. A lending platform under FTC jurisdiction needs a Safeguards Rule program. A payroll or reconciliation product that feeds customers' ledgers will be asked for SOC 1. Map your products, licenses, and data flows first, then pick the rows. State licensing regimes, such as New York's DFS cybersecurity regulation for licensed entities, can add further requirements.

SOC 1 or SOC 2: which report do customers need?

The deciding question is who reads the report and why. If your customers' external auditors need to rely on your processing to sign off on their financial statements, for example because you calculate interest, move funds, or produce ledger entries, they need a SOC 1. If customers are assessing whether you protect their data and keep the service available, they need a SOC 2. Many fintechs end up with both, and the IT general controls tested in each overlap heavily. See SOC 2 compliance for how the criteria are structured.

What the Safeguards Rule requires in practice

  • Designate a qualified individual to oversee the program, who may be an employee or a service provider you supervise.
  • Base safeguards on a written risk assessment that sets criteria for evaluating risks and is updated periodically.
  • Implement access controls, a data inventory, encryption of customer information in transit and at rest, and multi-factor authentication for anyone accessing information systems.
  • Run annual penetration testing and vulnerability assessments every six months, unless you have effective continuous monitoring.
  • Oversee service providers, train staff, maintain a written incident response plan, and have the qualified individual report to the board at least annually.
  • Notify the FTC as soon as possible, and no later than 30 days after discovery, of a notification event involving unencrypted information of at least 500 consumers.

What a sponsor bank will ask for

Typical bank partner diligence package

  • Information security policy set, approved and dated, with evidence of annual review
  • Most recent SOC 2 report or ISO 27001 certificate, plus any PCI DSS attestation of compliance
  • Risk assessment and a current risk register with treatment owners
  • Your own vendor management program, since the bank inherits your fourth parties
  • Business continuity and incident response plans, with test results
  • Penetration test summary and remediation status of findings
  • Complaint handling, compliance management, and BSA/AML procedures where relevant to the product

A sensible order of work

  1. Reduce PCI scope before you document it. Tokenization or a hosted payment flow can remove most systems from scope. See PCI DSS compliance.
  2. Stand up the core security program that GLBA, bank partners, and SOC 2 all expect: risk assessment, access control, MFA, encryption, logging, incident response.
  3. Get a SOC 2 Type I, then start the Type II period, adding SOC 1 if customers' auditors ask for it.
  4. Build vendor oversight early, since banks and regulators both look through you to your providers.
  5. Add ISO 27001 when you expand internationally or enterprise buyers request it.

Mistakes that surface during diligence

  • Assuming a processor's PCI compliance covers you. It covers their environment, not your integration or your staff.
  • Letting the SOC 2 scope exclude the money-movement systems a bank partner actually cares about.
  • Running separate spreadsheets for PCI, SOC 2, and bank questionnaires that describe the same control three different ways.
  • Having no named owner for the Safeguards Rule annual board report.

Running it as one program in Asurvo

Asurvo covers PCI DSS 4.0.1, SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, and CCPA/CPRA in one workspace, with automated cross-mapping so a single access review or encryption control counts everywhere it applies. The Third Party module handles vendor inventory, tiering, and questionnaires, and the Audit module gives external auditors their own workspace for requests and findings.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Does a fintech need PCI DSS if it uses a payment processor?

Usually yes, but the scope can be small. If card data never touches your systems because you use a hosted page or tokenization, you may qualify for a short self-assessment questionnaire. Your acquirer or processor decides which validation you must complete. Integrations where your systems can affect the security of the payment flow bring more requirements into scope.

Who does the GLBA Safeguards Rule apply to?

The FTC's Safeguards Rule applies to financial institutions within the FTC's jurisdiction, which generally means non-bank businesses significantly engaged in financial activities, such as many consumer lenders, mortgage brokers, and some payment-related firms. Banks are covered by their own banking regulators' safeguards standards instead. Confirm applicability with counsel, since it depends on your activities rather than how you describe yourself.

Is SOC 1 or SOC 2 better for a fintech?

Neither is better; they answer different questions. SOC 1 addresses controls relevant to customers' financial reporting and is read by their auditors. SOC 2 addresses security and related criteria and is read by security and procurement teams. If your service affects customers' financial statements, expect SOC 1 requests. Most fintechs selling to businesses are asked for SOC 2 regardless.

What changed in bank partner oversight in 2023?

In June 2023 the Federal Reserve, FDIC, and OCC issued final interagency guidance on third-party relationships and risk management. It sets expectations for how banks plan, perform due diligence on, contract with, and monitor third parties across the relationship life cycle. For fintechs, that translates into more structured and recurring diligence requests from sponsor banks.

Does DORA apply to non-EU fintechs?

DORA applies directly to EU financial entities. A non-EU fintech is usually affected indirectly, as an ICT third-party service provider to an EU financial entity, which must then impose contractual terms, oversight, and exit arrangements on you. Providers designated as critical face direct oversight. If you serve EU banks, insurers, or payment institutions, expect DORA-driven contract clauses.

Ready to replace the spreadsheet chaos?

See Asurvo in action with a 20-minute walkthrough tailored to your stack and frameworks.