The Trust Services Criteria are often summarized as five boxes to tick, but the structure underneath is more detailed than that. The five are more precisely called categories. Each category contains numbered criteria, and each criterion comes with points of focus that describe what a well-designed control would typically address. A SOC 2 auditor evaluates your controls against the criteria, not against a fixed control list.
The categories and their criteria
Inside the Common Criteria
Security is mandatory because its criteria, known as the Common Criteria, form the foundation every other category builds on. They are grouped into nine series. The first five follow the components of the COSO 2013 Internal Control framework, which is why SOC 2 feels familiar to anyone with a financial controls background.
Points of focus are guidance, not requirements
Each criterion lists points of focus, for example specific considerations under CC6.1 about restricting logical access. They help both you and the auditor judge whether a control addresses the criterion, but not every point of focus must be addressed, and an organization can meet a criterion in ways the points of focus do not mention. What matters is that your controls credibly satisfy the criterion for your system.
Choosing which categories to include
- Availability: include if customers depend on uptime commitments or you publish an SLA.
- Confidentiality: include if you handle customer information designated as confidential, such as business plans, source code, or financial data.
- Processing Integrity: include if customers rely on the accuracy of your processing, such as payments, payroll, or data transformation.
- Privacy: include if you collect personal information directly from individuals and make privacy commitments to them. Service providers that only process personal data on behalf of business customers often address it through Confidentiality instead.